ObjectionEastern Religious

Karma vs. Grace

The concept of unearned grace disrupts the cosmic justice of karma.

The Objection

Hindu and Buddhist traditions teach that karma—the law of moral cause and effect—governs the universe. Every action has consequences that must be experienced. Christianity's teaching of unearned grace and forgiveness seems to violate this cosmic justice.

Key Claims

Actions must have consequences

Unearned forgiveness is unjust

Grace undermines moral responsibility

Karma maintains cosmic balance

Source / Further Reading

Hindu/Buddhist philosophy

Christian Response

How apologists address this objection

Grace does not ignore justice—the cross satisfies justice while extending mercy. Someone paid the karmic debt; it was Christ.

Christianity agrees that sin has consequences—but Christ bore those consequences

Grace is not 'cheap'—it cost God everything at the cross

Karma offers no hope of escape; grace offers transformation and new beginning

Justice and mercy meet at the cross—God is both just and the justifier (Romans 3:26)

Grace doesn't eliminate moral responsibility—it empowers genuine transformation

Recommended Reading

Timothy Keller, The Reason for God

Quick Info

TypeObjection
CategoryEastern Religious
Key Points4
Response Points5

Response Available

This objection includes a detailed Christian response with 5 key points.